پژوهش ادبیات معاصر جهان

پژوهش ادبیات معاصر جهان

طردگرایی و کنش انقلابی در شعر محمد صالح دیلان و محمد العید آل خلیفه: رویکردی تطبیقی و جامعه‌شناختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده
گروه زبان و ادبیات عربی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران.
10.22059/jor.2023.352070.2366
چکیده
محمّد صالح دیلان شاعر کُرد و محمّد العید آل خلیفه شاعر الجزائری از شعرای معاصر هستند که در دورۀ سلطۀ رژیم بعث عراق بر کُردستان و بُرهۀ استعمار الجزائر توسّط دولت فرانسه می­زیسته­اند. در چنین شرایطی، دو شاعر به­عنوان شعرای پایبند به آرمان والای آزادی و استقلال، سروده­های خود را به آینۀ بازنمایی رنج­های مردم استعمارزده و ستمدیدۀ کُردستان و الجزائر تبدیل ساخته و با تأکید بر لُزوم استعمارستیزی و زدودن سلطۀ اشغالگران، انقلاب را تنها گریزگاه رهایی از تاریک­نای دیجور استعمار و اشغالگری می­پندارند. در پس­زمینۀ رویکرد انقلابی و بیگانه­ستیزی دو شاعر، علاوه­ بر رنج­بُردن از اِشغال زادبوم مادری و احساس حقارت و سرخوردگیِ بُرون­تراویده از آن، عوامل زیربنایی همچون محرومیّت، همگون­سازی فرهنگی مردمِ بومی سرزمین­های تحت سلطه و ارتکاب جنایات وجود دارد که دو شاعر را به‌ سوی طردگرایی و انقلابی­گری گسیل داشته است. از آن روی که تاکنون جستار مستقلّی به بررسی عوامل گرایش محمّد دیلان و محمّد العید به طردگرایی و انقلابی­گری نپرداخته است، نگارنده بر آن است تا به تحلیل تطبیقی این پدیده در سروده­های دو شاعر بپردازد. مسألۀ بنیادین پژوهش حاضر این است که عوامل زمینه­سازِ طردگرایی و انقلابی­گری، چگونه و در چه قالب­هایی در سروده­های دو شاعر نمود یافته و با چه مفاهیمی پیوند خورده است؟ در راستای بررسی این مسأله، نگارنده از روش توصیفی­ ـ تحلیلی و تطبیقی و مقایسه­ای مُبتنی بر تحلیل جامعه­شناختی بُن­مایه­های سروده­های دو شاعر بهره گرفته­­ است. وجود عوامل زمینه­ایِ نشأت­گرفته از سلطۀ رژیم­های استعمارگر و اشغالگر، دو شاعر را به سوی طردگرایی و کُنش انقلابی سوق داده است. گُسترۀ سروده­های انقلابی دیلان بسیار فراخ­تر از اشعار انقلابی محمّد العید است، همچنان­ که سروده­های دیلان اِلقاکنندۀ خشمی فراگیرتر است که گاه با آتشفشانی از کینه و نفرت آمیخته می­شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Exclusionism and Revolutionary Action in the Poetry of Muhammad Salih Dilan and Muhammad al-Eid Al Khalifa: A Comparative Sociological Study

نویسنده English

Esmaeil Barwasi
Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده English

Muhammad Saleh Dilan, a Kurdish poet, and Muhammad Al-Eid Al khalifah, an Algerian poet, are contemporary poets who lived during the Iraqi Ba'ath regime's domination over Kurdistan and the colonization of Algeria by the French, respectively. In such situations, the two poets, as poets committed to the lofty ideal of freedom and independence, turned their poems into a mirror for reflecting the sufferings of the colonized and oppressed peoples of Kurdistan and Algeria and by emphasizing the necessity of decolonization and the eradication of the occupiers' domination, they consider revolution as the only escape from the clutches and darkness of colonialism and occupation. Underlying the tendency of the two poets towards revolution, in addition to sufferings caused by the occupation of the motherland and the feelings of humiliation and frustration arising from it, there also are factors such as deprivation, assimilation of the colonized people and committing crimes, which pushed Dilan and Al-Eid towards taking revolutionary actions. Since, no independent research has investigated the factors of passive and beneficial tendency for revolutionary actions, the author is determined to do a comparative analysis of the phenomenon in the poems of the two poets. The fundamental issue dealt with in the current study is that how and in what forms underlying and predisposing factors of exclusionism and revolutionary actions are reflected in the poems of the two poets, and with what concepts they are linked? In order to investigate this issue, the author has used a descriptive-analytical, comparative method based on a sociological investigation of their poems. The existence of background factors originating from a colonialist and occupying hegemony has forced the poets to adopt a revolutionary approach. The scope of Dilan's revolutionary poems is much wider than Al-Eid's, as well as Dilan's poems express a more comprehensive anger, which is sometimes mixed with a volcano of grudge and hatred

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Political literature
Revolution
Exclusionism
Deprivation
Crime
Assimilation
Muhammad Saleh Dilan
Muhammad Al-Eid Al khalifah
Ahmadi, Ali Akbar and Sohayla Darabi. 2020. “The dimenshon of theory of post decolonization the novel of (Zakerat Al-jasad) by Ahlam Al-Mostaghanemi and (Hamsayeha) by Ahmad Mahmoud”. Research in Contemporary World Literature. 24(2): 307-334. https://doi.org/10.22059/jor.2019.214370.1435.
Al-Eid Al Khalifa, Muhammad.2010. Collection of Poems. Ain Malilla: Dar Alhoda publications.
Ali, Dilshad. 1981. Dilan Poet and Libertarian. Baghdad: Iraqi Science Society Publishing House.
Allush, Sa'd. 1987. Schools of Comparative Literature: A Methodological Study. Beirut: Arab Cultural Center.
Arendt, Hannah. 2023. On Violence. Translated by Ezzatollah Fouladvand. Fourth edition. Tehran: Kharazmi Publications.
Bashiriyeh, Hosein. 2008. Teaching Political Knowledge. Ninth edition. Tehran: Ney publications.
Brinton, Carne. 1960. The Anatomy of Revolution. New York: Vintage.
Brooker, Paul. 2005. Non-Democratic Regimes: Theory, Government and Politics. Translated by Alireza Sami'i. Second edition. Tehran: Kavir Publications.
Bouaishawi, Walid. 2017. Linguistic Formation in the Poems of Muhammad Al-Eid Al Khalifa. Algeria: Master's thesis.
Calvert, Peter. 2004. Revolution and Counter-Revolution. Translated by Saeed Qanei. Tehran: Ashian Publications.
Chaliand, Gerard. 2010. The Kurdish Tragedy. Translated by Veria Rahmani. First Edition. Duhok: Mokriani Institute.
Cohan, Alvin Stanford. 2008. Theories of Revolution. Translated by Alireza Tayeb. Seventeenth edition. Tehran: Qomas publications.
Dilan, Mohammad Salih. 2012. Collection of Poems. Second Edition. Erbil: Chwarchira Publishing House.
Edwards, Lyford P. 1927. The Natural History of Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foran, John. ed. 2007. Theorizing Revolutions. Translated by Farhang Irshad. Tehran: Ney publication.
Giddens, Anthony. 1989. Sociology. Oxford: Polity press.
Goldstone, Jack A., ed. 2006. Revolutions: Theoretical, Comparative, and Historical Studies. Translated by Mohammad Taghi Delaforouz. Tehran: Kavir Publications
Golmohammadi, Ahmad. 2016. Globalization, Culture, Identity. Ninth edition. Tehran: Ney publication.
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1973. “The Revolution-Social-Change Nexus: Some Old Theories and New Hypotheses”. Comparative Politics. 5(3): 359-392. https://doi.org/10.2307/421270.
Gurr, Ted Robert. 2018. Why Men Rebel? Translated by Ali Morshedizad. Third edition. Tehran: Publications of The Research Institute of Strategic Studies.
Haslam, Nick and Steve Loughnan. 2014. “Dehumanization and Infra-humanization”. Annual Review of Psychology. 65(1): 399-423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045.
Hosseini Akbarnejad, Hale and Houriya Hosseini Akbarnejad. 2020. “Examination of the Draft Convention on Prohibition and Punishment of Crimes against Humanity”. Researches of criminal law and criminology. 48(15): 227-254.
Hozelitz, Bert F and Ann Wilner. 1962. Economic Development Political Strategies and American Aid. New York: Wiley publications.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968a. Revolutionary Change. Boston: Little - Brown.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968b. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University.
Ibn Samina, Muhammad. 1992. Muhammad Al-Eid; An Analytical Study of his Life. Ben Aknoun: University publications.
Kelman, Herbert C. 1973. “Violence without Moral Restraint; Reflections on the Dehumanization of Victims and Victimizers”. Journal of Social Issues. 29(4): 23-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00102.x.
Kharfi, Saleh. 1984. Modern Algerian Poetry. Algeria: The National Writers Association.
Khaznadar, Marif. 2010. History of Kurdish Literature. Erbil: Aras Publishing House.
Khezri, Haydar. 2008. “Comparative Literature in Eastern European Countries”. Scientific Journal of the Iranian Association of Arabic Language and Literature. 4(10): 19-38. 20.1001.1.23456361.1429.4.10.2.8.
Memmy, Albert. 2021. The Colonizer and the Colonized. Translated by Homa Natiq. Tehran: Parnian-andish publication.
Moosavinia, Sayyed Rahim. 2020. “Representing Trauma in Haruki Murakami's Landscape with Flatiron”. Research in Contemporary World Literature. 27(1): 503-537. https://doi.org/10.22059/jor.2020.288882.1895.
Neumann, Sigmund. 1949. “The International Civil War”. Journal of World Politics. 1(3): 333-350. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009034.
Nicholson, Ronald B. 1994. “Ethnic Nationalism and Religious Exclusivism”. Journal of Politikon. 21(2): 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589349408705008.
Richards, Barry. 2003. The Psychoanalysis of Popular Culture. Translated by Hossein Payandeh. Tehran: Tarhe now publications.
Robertson, David. 1985. The Penguin Dictionary of Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Rocher, Guy. 2016. Social changes. Translated by Mansour Vosouqi. Tehran: Ney Publications.
Saadollah, Abul Qasim. 1998. Muhammad Al-Eid: The Pioneer of Modern Algerian Poetry. Cairo: Knowledge House.
Sotoudeh, Hedayatollah. 2009. Social Psychology. Twelfth edition. Tehran: Avaye Noor Publications.
Soule, George. 1935. The Coming American Revolution. New York: Macmillan.
Spielberger, Charls D. ed. 2004. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. New York: Academic press.
Spiro, Herbert and others. 2006. Totalitarianism. Translated by Hadi Nouri. First edition. Tehran: Fardise Danesh Publications.