Female Resistances against the Dominant discourse of Patriarchy In Shakespeare's Winter's Tale With Special References to Greenblatt's and Sinfield's Theories

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

At the dawn of the modern period, the English society was a patriarchal one. In other words, men dominated the society and the family. Patriarchal standards of Elizabethan age introduced women as figures that should be dominated and controlled. In most of Shakespeare's plays the conflict between women and the patriarchal ideology has been shown. Women's resistance is the point of disagreement between Stephen Greenblatt who founded new historicism and Alan Sinfield who is one of cultural materialists in Britain. Greenblatt has a negative understanding of the mechanisms of power relations in which he states that resistances are contained within the standards of the dominant while Sinfield believes in the faultlines of the texts in which the dominant cannot hold the ground. Paulina can be seen as a clear manifestation of the text's gap. This study focuses on this disagreement with special references to the Winter's Tale by W. Shakespeare. It also tries to analyze the how female voices tried to gain power and space to be articulated.

Keywords

References

Althusser, Louis, (1971), Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays, trans. Ben Breswester, Verso, London.
---. (1998), ‘Ideological State Apparatus’, in Julie Revkin and Michael Ryan (eds.), Literary Theory: An Anthology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
Bakhtin, Mikhail,(1984) Rabelais and His World, Trans. Hélène Iswolsky. 1965 (Russian), 1968 (English, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Bloomington: Midland-Indiana University PressProblems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson.Theory and History of Literature 8.1963 (Russian). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,
Dollimore, Jonathan and Alan Sinefield (eds.), (1985), Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
Foucault, Michel, (1975),The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of MedicalPerception, Vintage Books, New York.
---. (1977),Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Penguin Press, London.
---. (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, Collin Gordon (ed.), Harvester, London.
---. (1982), ‘The Subject and Power’, in H. Dreyfus and P. Rabino (eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Brighton: Harvester.
---. (1984), The History of Sexuality: Volume 1, trans. Robert Hurley, Vintage Books, New York.
Greenblatt, Stephan, (1980), Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More toShakespeare, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Greenblatt, Stephan, (1988), Shakespearian Negotiations: The Circulation of SocialEnergy in Renaissance England, Oxford, England.
Julie Revkin and Michel Ryan (eds),(2004) Literary Theory: An Anthology, Malden, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
Lodge, David, (1999), Modern criticism and theory;A Reader, Longman
Makaryk, Irena Rima, (1993), Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory, General Editor and Compiler, University of Toronto Press.
Montrose, Louis, (1989), ‘Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture’, in N. Aram Vesser (ed.), The New Historicism, New York
Selden, R., and Widdowson, P., (1993), A Readers Guide to ContemporaryLiteraryTheory, Bidles Ltd., London.
Sinfeld, Alan, (1992), Faultlines: Cultural Materialism and the Politics of Dissidence Reading, Oxford, London.
Williams, Raymond, (1977), Marxism And Literature, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
---. (1981), Culture, Glasgow: Fontana.
 
 
Research in Contemporary World Literature
Volume 20, Issue 2 - Serial Number 72
Autumn & Winter
October 2015
Pages 217-230

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics