%0 Journal Article %T "Methodology of Systemic Formalism" A Pioneering Model in The Formulation of Literary History Writing In the 20th Century %J Research in Contemporary World Literature %I University of Tehran %Z 2588-4131 %A Hojatizadeh, Raziyeh %D 2022 %\ 07/23/2022 %V 27 %N 1 %P 174-206 %! "Methodology of Systemic Formalism" A Pioneering Model in The Formulation of Literary History Writing In the 20th Century %K systemic formalism %K synchrony %K diachrony %K system of systems %K Canon %R 10.22059/jor.2020.297651.1948 %X Today, it has been evident that without having a theory or a definite approach either to literature & history, writing a history of literature becomes totally impossible. Despite the initial contradiction between formalistic & historical methodologies, systemic formalism could be recognized as a pioneer movement which could formulate a definite methodological framework for history writing of literature. With such a perspective in mind, systemic formalism projected some terms as: evolution, change, historical dynamism, canonicity, dominant trait, system & so on. This approach, in spite of the criticisms made against it, took the first steps in bridging the gap between synchronic & diachronic studies in literature. Moreover, Literature which has been served until then as a covering to prove the assumptions of historians to interpret the flow of history became the main focus of historical studies. Following a critical approach, this paper seeks to answer these questions: first, what are the theoretical origins of systemic formalism? Secondly, what are its possibilities & limitations in compiling a history of literature? %U https://jor.ut.ac.ir/article_86412_78df7f9d1b785051383f37955546ff54.pdf